#Renault captur windows

Space in the boot for four-wheel drive versions is a disappointing 251-litres. Comparatively, the Juke with the false boot floor in its lowest position holds 352 litres expandable to 1,189-litres with the seats folded.įour-wheel drive Jukes don’t have the option of that variable floor because the rear differential eats into the boot. You can expand the boot to 455 litres if the rear bench is slid forward. It holds 377 litres with the rear seats in place and 1,235 litres with them folded flat. The Captur is the more practical of the two. Called the Nismo RS, it’s powered by a 215 hp 1.6-litre petrol and achieves a 7.9 second 0-62mph time while achieving just shy of 40mpg on average. The Juke is the only one to offer a performance variation.

The 1.2-litre turbo petrol in the Juke is especially good thanks to being extremely smooth and quiet.

Petrol units are great in both cars, with the most efficient in the Captur achieving 56.5mpg. For instance, the most economical diesel engine in the Capture’s line-up averages 76.4 mpg and 95g/km of CO2 compared to the Juke which musters just over 70mpg. Enginesīetween the Captur and Juke, the former is the more efficient. It can only be applied to models with the 1.6-litre turbocharged engines. The Captur is the more comfortable machine and the Juke has slightly firmer suspension which ‘jiggles’ over rough surfaces.Ī key difference between the Captur and Juke is that the Renault is only available with front-wheel drive while the Nissan can be specified with an optional four-wheel-drive system. Their taller bodies mean increased body roll. Neither is as fun as traditional hatchbacks when going down a twisty back road. They also share similarly light controls making town driving an absolute doddle and both are quiet and refined meaning they’ll be useful to take on long journeys. DrivingĬompact SUVs have a raised driving position which, ultimately, gives you a better view of the road – both the Captur and Juke offer this advantage.

#Renault captur windows

In the Juke, rear passengers struggle for headroom – and the rear windows are small making the back feel a little claustrophobic. The Captur has more interior space for passengers primarily because its roofline isn’t as steeply raked as the Juke’s. For instance, the centre console, air vent surrounds and interior panels can be specified in your colour of choice which makes it a very vibrant place to sit. The Juke is a bit more characterful on the inside. The Captur looks classy when you step inside thanks to the minimalist layout coupled with some pretty high quality materials. This may help the Juke look more sporty but it compromises rear headroom somewhat. Other distinctive differences are the inclusion of a more raked roofline on the Nissan Juke compared to the Captur. This makes the Juke instantly recognisable because it’s unlike anything else on the road. The Juke, on the other hand, is altogether a more striking proposition, with sharp lines and distinctive creases.

The Captur is a handsome looking vehicle thanks to its stylish curves inherited from the smaller Clio on which it’s based. Want to see more crossover options? Check out our list of the best small SUVs and crossovers. Put either the Renault Captur or the Nissan Juke in our car configurator to see how much carwow could help you save. These two SUVs share a platform and engines but couldn’t look more different if they tried. We’re pitting the Renault Captur and Nissan Juke face-to-face to help you figure out which compact crossover is best.